Michael Saylor has come out against Bitcoin's BIP-110, citing concerns about censorship.

Michael Saylor has voiced opposition to Bitcoin’s BIP-110 due to concerns about censorship.

Frequently Asked Questions
Here is a list of FAQs about Michael Saylors opposition to Bitcoins BIP110 covering beginner to advanced angles

BeginnerLevel Questions

1 What is BIP110
BIP110 is a proposed change to Bitcoins code It would allow miners to include a free transaction in a block even if the block is full The idea is to ensure that important transactions always get confirmed quickly

2 Why is Michael Saylor against it
Saylor argues that giving miners a guaranteed free slot could lead to censorship He worries that miners might use that slot to block transactions they dont like which would hurt Bitcoins neutrality

3 Does this mean Saylor thinks miners are evil
No Hes concerned about the potential for abuse not that miners are currently malicious He believes Bitcoin should be designed so that no single group has the power to pick and choose which transactions succeed

4 Is BIP110 already active
No It is just a proposal It hasnt been adopted by the Bitcoin network

5 Does Saylor want to ban BIP110 completely
Yes he has publicly urged the community to reject it He believes it introduces unnecessary risk to Bitcoins core principle of permissionless transactions

IntermediateLevel Questions

6 What specific censorship is Saylor worried about
He fears that a miner could use the free slot to always include their own transaction effectively blocking a specific users transaction from ever being confirmed in a full block This could be used to blacklist addresses or prevent certain payments from settling

7 Doesnt BIP110 help with dust or lowvalue transactions
The proposals supporters say it helps by ensuring small lowfee transactions dont get stuck Saylor counters that the cure is worse than the disease He prefers raising the base fee or using other scaling solutions

8 How does this relate to Saylors view on Bitcoin as a store of value
Saylor sees Bitcoin primarily as a hard asset not a payment network He believes any change that weakens

Scroll to Top